SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 589

SUJOY PAUL, VIVEK JAIN
Akhilesh Kumar S/o Mathura Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Paresh Pareek
For the Respondents: Ayush Dev Bajpai, Amrit Lal Gupta

ORDER :

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners, who are allottees of shops, which were allotted to them by Gram Panchayat, Bahoriband, District Katni. The present petition seeks to challenge the order dated 07.09.2022 (Annexure P-1) and order dated 26.05.2023 (Annexure P-2). By the order Annexure P-1, the competent authority under M.P. Lok Parisar Bedakhali Adhiniyam, 1974 (for short referred to as ‘Adhiniyam 1974’) has ordered eviction the petitioners from the shops by exercising powers under Section 5 of the said Adhiniyam, while by the order Annexure P-2, the appellate authority under the said Adhiniyam has rejected the appeal of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners while assailing the orders Annexure P-1 and P-2 has stated that certain shops were constructed by Gram Panchayat, Bahoriband (respondent No. 6) and after such construction, the shops were allotted to the present petitioners by the Gram Panchayat and the allotment was on lease with monthly rent. The lease was of 35 months and contained a renewal clause after expiry of 35 months period with 10% increase of monthly rent. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the evict

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top