SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 617

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, J.
Mahle Engine Components India Private Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Board Of Revenue Chief Controlling Revenue Authority And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 13492 of 2019
Decided On : 15-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Akshay Sapre, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Tarun Kushwah, Government Advocate

Stamp duty on amalgamation is applicable only if immovable property is transferred within the state; otherwise, it should be based on the market value of shares issued.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394 - Stamp Act - Article 25 - Writ Petition challenging the imposition of stamp duty on a Scheme of Amalgamation - The Collector imposed stamp duty based on immovable property not located in Madhya Pradesh, which was incorrect - The petitioner contended that no immovable property was transferred, thus only 0.5% of the market value of shares should apply - The Board of Revenue upheld the Collector's order, leading to this petition. (Paras 4, 5, 8, 11)

(B) Amalgamation - Legal framework - The court emphasized that stamp duty is only applicable on immovable property located within the state, and if none exists, the duty should be based on the market value of shares issued. (Paras 8, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a company, sought to challenge the stamp duty imposed by the Collector on a Scheme of Amalgamation with another company, arguing that no immovable property was transferred within Madhya Pradesh.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Collector's order was incorrect as no immovable property was transferred, and the matter was remitted back for proper assessment.

Issues: The main issues were whether any immovable property was transferred within Madhya Pradesh and the correct application of stamp duty under the Stamp Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that stamp duty is only applicable if immovable property is transferred within the state; otherwise, the duty should be based on the market value of shares issued.

Result: Writ Petition is allowed.

ORDER :

Vivek Rusia, J.

The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition being aggrieved by the order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Collector and the order dated 22.08.2018 passed by the Board of Revenue, Gwalior, and the collector of stamps.

2. The Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (Now 2013) having its registered office at Plot No.9,10,11, Sector 3 Industrial Area, Kheda, Pithampur, District Dhar. Vide resolution dated 01.07.2019 passed by the Board of Directors, Mr. Syed Mohammad Aun has been authorized to file this Writ Petition.

3. The petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee company) along with its other group company MAHLE IPL Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Transferor Company'') having its registered office within the State of Tamil Nadu decided to carry out a restructuring of the group for simplification of their structure and control and prepared Scheme of Amalgamation with the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'Transferee Company'). In this regard, Company Petition No.22/2014 under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was filed by the Transferee company for approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 28.11.2014 final order was passed by the Company Judge. Similarly, the Transferor Company has also filed Company Petition No.301 of 2014 before the Court of Judicature at Madras under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act. Vide order dated 11.12.2014, approval was granted for the Scheme of Amalgamation.

4. According to the Transferee company under the Scheme of Amalgamation as part of the consideration, one fully paid up equity share of Rs.10 each of the Transferee company is to be issued and allotted against every 3.0116 fully paid equity shares of Rs. 10 each to Directors of Transferor Company. As per the valuation report dated 10.03.2014 submitted by MZSK & Associates, the market value of the Transferee company share was estimated at Rs.266.40. Accordingly, 34,60,349 number of shares having a value of Rs.92,18,36,973.60 were issued by the Transferee company to the shareholders of the Transferor Company. It is further submitted by the Transferee company that the Transferor Company did not own any immovable property located within the State of Madhya Pradesh, thus no immovable property located within the State of Madhya Pradesh was transferred to the Transferee company under the Scheme of Amalgamation. After the order passed by this Court as well as the High Court of Madras, the petitioner submitted an application on 15.01.2015 before the Collector seeking adjudication about the payment of the stamp duty Deed of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 21.09.2016, the Collector of Stamp directed the petitioner to pay the stamp duty of Rs.6,98,32,399/-alongwith penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- as 5% of the total value of the immovable property of the Transferor company located in the State of Tamilnadu.

5. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner/ the Transferee company filed an application for review on 22.11.2016, thereafter when no order was passed, a Revision was preferred under Section 56 of the Stamp Act before the Board of Revenue. Vide impugned order dated 02.08.2021, the Revenue Board dismissed the Revision and upheld the order of Collector, hence, this Writ Petition before this Court.

6. Shri Akshay Sapre, learned counsel for the Transferee company submits that the Collector, as well as the Board of Revenue, have failed to consider the provision of proviso (a) of Article 25 of Stamp Act which says that 5% of the market value of the immovable property transferred under the Scheme of Amalgamation which is located within the State of Madhya Pradesh or 0.5% of the aggregate of the market value of the shares issued or allotted in exchange or otherwise and the amount of consideration paid for such transfer whichever is higher, hence, under the Scheme of Amalgamation when no immovable property located within the State of Madhya Pradesh was t

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top