SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 20

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, VIVEK JAIN
In Reference (Suo Motu) – Appellant
Versus
The State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abhijeet Awasthi, Deputy Advocate General with Anubhav Jain, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

Kait, C.J. -- 1. This suo motu writ petition has been registered on account of divergent directions passed by the learned Single Judge, Indore Bench in Writ Petition No.39431 of 2024 (X Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others) vide order dated 12.12.2024, in which certain guidelines have been carved out in order to expedite the cases relating to termination of pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (for short “the MTP Act”). It was held that these guidelines shall be followed in each and every case whereas the learned Single Judge at Principal Seat, Jabalpur in Writ Petition No.3491 of 2025 (Prosecutrix X Vs. State of M.P. and others) vide order dated 28.01.2025 regarding matter of termination of pregnancy of rape survivor under the provisions as contained in section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 is of the view that pregnancy may be terminated where the length of pregnancy does not exceed 24 weeks without obtaining the order of the Court. Further held that permission from the Court is only required in cases where the pregnancy is of more than 24 weeks.

2. Taking serious note of procedural delay occurred in the case of rape survivo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top