SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 60

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Rao Uday Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rampat Barode – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Surendra Singh with Rohan Harne and Kartik Jaggi for petitioners; Aryan Shukla for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed under section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashment of complaint dated 1.4.2014, in pursuance to which, order dated 22.11.2023 has been passed framing charges against the petitioners and also the consequential proceedings pending before the Special Court.

2. As per the facts of the case, the respondent had filed a complaint on 1.4.2014 alleging that an offence under section 188 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short ‘I.P.C.’], has been committed by the present petitioners. The said private complaint is available on record as AnnexureP/1 and as per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioners violated the prohibitory order dated 7.3.2014 issued by the complainant who was the-then Sub-Divisional Magistrate imposing restrictions by using power of section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [for short ‘Cr.P.C.’]. The said prohibitory order dated 7.3.2014 is also available on record as Annexure-P/2. The order dated 7.3.2014 reveals that a prohibitory direction was issued towards general public conveying that several activities including political campaign shall remain prohibited till such order remains in for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top