SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 55

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Ashwini Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Prashant Sharma for petitioner; M.S. Jadon, Government Advocate, for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is preferred against the order dated 5.2.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena in Appeal No.9/2012 (Arms), wherein challenge was made to an order passed by the District Magistrate, District Bhind dated 31.7.2012, whereby he had rejected the application for renewal of arms license No.MP/BHD/1/254/2000B issued to the petitioner on the basis of non-recommendation by the Superintendent of Police (Bhind) vide letter dated 22.12.2011 and on the delay of 28 days in filing the application and while dismissing the appeal, the order of Collector has been affirmed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of trial against his minor brother the petitioner had moved an application for renewal of license in January, 2011. On the application, information was sought from the Superintendent of Police, who gave a wrong information that there is a case under section 307 of IPC and sections 25,27 and 30 of Arms Act. In fact, the case under section 30 of Arms Act against the petitioner, wherein he was acquitted vide judgment dated 25.5.2012 passed in case No.1204/09 and hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top