SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 31

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VINAY SARAF
Sunny Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Samveg Tripathi for petitioner; Sandeep Kumar Shukla for respondents.

Table of Content
1. disciplinary actions and appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding disproportionality of punishment (Para 6 , 7)
3. judicial review of disciplinary decisions (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. application of prior judgments to current case (Para 12 , 13)
5. final dismissal of petition (Para 14)

ORDER

Per: Justice Vinay Saraf

1. By the instant petition, the petitioner has called in question of legality, validity and propriety of order dated 3.10.2018 passed by Senior General Manager, Ordinance Factory Khamaria, Jabalpur, whereby the penalty of reduction of pay by one stage for a period of one year without cumulative effect was imposed upon the petitioner. The petitioner has also assailed the order dated 25.11.2019 passed by Additional DGOF and Member, Appellate Authority, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 6.12.2024 passed in O.A. No.227/2020 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, Bench at Jabalpur affirming the orders passed by disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority.

3. Heard Shri Samveg Tripathi, Advocate for petitioner on the question of admission.

4. The short fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top