SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1668

SUBODH ABHYANKAR, SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Basant – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. S. Rathore for appellant; Mukesh Kumawat, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

Singh, J. -- 1 The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) [in short Cr.P.C.] against the judgment dated 28.6.2011 passed by the Court of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in S.T.No.1042/2009, whereby the appellant has been convicted under section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC) and under Sec 25(1)(1-B) of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and 1 year R.I. with fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation.

2. Prosecution story in brief is as follows :

(i) About fifteen years ago complainant Saroj Kashyap's husband deceased Surendra Kashyap purchased a hath thela placed near Mahalaxmi Temple, opposite to Rajwada Indore from the appellant Basant Kala for an amount of Rs. 40,000/- and ran a shop of bangles therein. Appellant occasionally used to take an amount of Rs. 1,000/- as rent from the deceased and when the deceased denied to give the rent amount, appellant got angry and was having animosity with him. On 29.6.2009, at about 8:30 p.m. when deceased was going towards Rajwada Gate, appellant came there from opposite direction and with an intent to comm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top