SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 163

VIVEK RUSIA, GAJENDRA SINGH
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Lachu @ Laxmi Narayan – Respondent


Advocates:
Bhawan Gautam for appellant; Ms. Dixita Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

Rusia, J:-

1. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others have filed this writ appeal under section 2(1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypith Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 21.1.2025 passed in W.P. No.1716/2024 by the Single Bench in favour of the respondent/writ petitioner.

2. The details of the case are already mentioned in the impugned order of the Writ Court, but for the sake of convenience, they are reproduced in nutshell.

2.1 The respondent/ writ petitioner was sentenced with L.I. for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment dated 13.1.1997 passed by the learned 13th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore.

2.2 The respondent/ writ petitioner preferred an application for release on probation under section 2 of the M.P. Prisoner’s Release on Probation Act, 1954 (in short “Act of 1954”). Vide order dated 12.2.2021, the application was rejected by the competent authority.

2.3 The respondent challenged the rejection by way of W.P. No.1523/2001 and vide order dated 17.4.2002 the writ petition was allowed by directing the State to release the writ petitioner on probation within a period of 1 month.

2.4. In compliance with the order p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top