SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 341

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rohit Arya and Anand Pathak, JJ.
Vikram @ Manoj Jat v. State of M.P.
Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2008 (Gwalior) : against the judgment
dated 5.1.2008, passed by Special Judge (Atrocities) Gwalior in
Special Case No.12 of 2001; Decided on 21.6.2016.

Advocates:
Pradeep Katare for appellant;
B.P.S. Chauhan, Government Advocate for respondent/State;
D.R. Sharma for complainant.

Headnote:Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss.147, 148 and 302/149 -- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 -- S.3(2)(v) -- offence under -- trial Court convicted and sentenced appellant -- appeal preferred -- interested witnesses cannot be presumed to be tainted instead upon corroboration -- same stands on same footing as that of independent witness -- evidene of eye witness critically examined in a comprehensive manner and rightly reached conclusion that this evidence is worth credence -- appellant was member of unlawful assembly -- minor discrepancies in statement of eye witnesses cannot be given any undue importance -- Sessions Judge rightly convicted appellant -- appeal dismissed.

       Held : In the light of these facts, this Court is of the firm opinion that the appellant was member of the unlawful assembly in furtherance of the common object/knowledge causing death of the deceased, Balkishan. Hence, the Sessions Judge has rightly convicted the appellant for the offence under section 302/149 IPC. (1997)1 SCC 80,AIR 1983 SC 753, AIR 1978 SC 1525, (1989)1 SCC 437, (2010)13 SCC 409 and (2013)4 SCC 607 followed. AIR 1985 SC 1384 referred to.

        naM lafgrk] 1860 & /kkjk 147] 148 rFkk 302@149 & vuqlwfpr tkfr;k¡ vkSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr;k¡ ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1989 & /kkjk 3¼2½¼5½ & v/khu vijk/k & fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vihykFkhZ dks nks"kfl} rFkk naMkfn"V fd;k & vihy izLrqr & fgrc} lk{khx.k laiq"V gksus ds LFkku ij nwf"kr gksus dk vuqeku ugha yxk;k tk ldk & tks fd Lora= lk{kh dh rjg ,d&gh vk/kkj ij fLFkr gS & izR;FkhZn'khZ lkf{k;ksa dh lk{; dk lekykspukRed foLr`r <ax ls ijh{k.k fd;k rFkk Bhd&gh fu"d"kZ ij igq¡ps fd ;g lk{; fo'okl ds ;ksX; gS & vihykFkhZ fof/k fo:} teko dk lnL; Fkk & izR;{kn'khZ lkf{k;ksa ds dFku esa NksVs varj dk dksbZ vlE;d~ egRo ugha fn;k tk ldrk & l= U;k;k/kh'k us vihykFkhZ dks Bhd&gh nks"kflf} fd;k & vihy [kkfjtA

       vfHkfu/kkZfjr % bu rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] bl U;k;ky; dh n`<+ jk; gS fd vihykFkhZ e`rd ckyfd'ku dh e`R;q dkfjr djus ds fy, lkekU; mn~ns';@Kku ds izksRlkgu ds fy, fof/k fo:} teko dk lnL; FkkA blfy,] l= U;k;k/kh'k us vihykFkhZ dks Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302@149 ds v/khu vijk/k ds fy, Bhd&gh fl}nks"k fd;kA ¼1997½ 1 ,l lh lh 80] , vkb vkj 1983 ,l lh 753] , vkb vkj 1978 ,l lh 1525] ¼1989½ 1 ,l lh lh 437] ¼2010½ 13 ,l lh lh 409 rFkk ¼2013½ 4 ,l lh lh 607 vuqlfjrA , vkb vkj 1985 ,l lh 1384 fufnZ"VA

       

JUDGMENT

Arya, J. -- 1. This appeal, under section 374 CrPC, at the instance of the convict Vikram alias Manoj Jat s/o Govind Singh Jat is against the judgment dated 5.1.2008 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Gwalior in Special Case No.12/2001. The appellant is convicted under section 148 IPC and sentenced to suffer 2 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- as well as under sections 302/149 IPC for life imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- besides, in default to undergo six months further imprisonment for each offence and direction that both the jail sentences shall run concurrently.

2. As per prosecution story, on the date of incident, i.e., on 3.6.2000 at about 8:00 a.m. deceased Balkishan belonging to “Batham community”, while going to attend Water Shed Committee meeting being President, was sitting at the Chabutara (Platform) near the bus stand at village Tiholi. In the close vicinity, at the check post of Forest Department, prosecution witness Buddharam Batham (PW3) was also sitting. Preetam, Mahesh (PW2) and Naval Kishore (PW4) had arrived at the bus stand just before occurrence of the incident after unloading cement at Stop Dam. At that time, a bus coming from Behad had come and stopped. Accused persons, Govind Singh, Vinod, Pratap Joshi, Dablu Joshi, Kamal Ojha and present appellant Vikram alighted from the bus. Appellant Vikram armed with Mouzar gun, Govind Singh armed with double barrel 12 bore gun, Vinod armed with single barrel 12 bore gun and the remaining three accused persons were armed with Katta (country made pistol). After getting down from the bus, all the accused persons took their position behind tractor-trolley standing on the other side of the road. Appellant Vikram fired a gun shot at the deceased, Balkishan which hit on his left hand. Deceased, Balkishan to save his life ran towards the Village. Accused, Vikram along with 5 co-accused chased the deceased Balkishan firing gun shots. Deceased Balkishan entered nearby house of Ratanlal (PW1). Accused Vikram along with 5 other co-accused also entered the house of PW1 Ratanlal. Accused persons dragged Balkishan in the courtyard of the house and fired several gun shots piercing through forehead, left eye, below ear lobe ¼duiVh½ and chest resulting into death of Balkishan. Thereafter they fled away.

3. PW3 Buddharam at about 9:00 a.m. lodged FIR (Exhibit P-3) at the Police Station Utila situated at about 4 kms from the place of incident. Case was registered under sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC and also under section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “the Act of 1989”). As regards death of Balkishan, marg report (Exhibit P-4) was also prepared. The investigation was carried out by B.S.Yadav, Station House Officer (PW6). Spot map was prepared vide Exhibit P-6. As per seizure memo (Exhibit P-5), the following items have been seized:

^^¼1½ ckjg cksj jkm.M dk [kks[kk ftuds isans ij FkksM+k yky isaV yxkA 'kfDreku ,Dlizsl ykUx jsUt fy[kk gS izdj.k ds ?kVuk LFky ds LFkku 1¼Mh½ vkedksM ij iM+k feyus ijA

¼2½ ,d ihry dk jkm.M ftuds isns ij 8 ,e-,e-ds-,Q- 98 fy[kk gS fcdk gS tks ?kVuk LFky jru yky okFke ds edku uacj 9 ds bZ LFkku dh [kisjsy ds edjs esa iM+k feyus ijA

¼3½ ?kVuk LFky jru yky ckFke ds vk¡xu tgk¡ e`rd ckyfd'ku dk 'ko iM+k gS 'ko ls fudys [kwu dh ekStwnk feV~VhA

¼4½ ?kVuk LFky 'ko ds ikl dh lknk feV~VhA

¼5½ e`rd ds 'ko ds flj ds uhps tehu esa xM+h gqbZ ,d xksyh ckjg cksj dh pkj fjDlh xRrs dh rFkk IykfLVd dh dkys jax dh Vksih tks pkj vaxqy tehu esa x<h gqbZ [kqnokus ls izkIr gksus ij rhuks vkbVeksa dks i`Fkd~&i`Fkd~ tIr fd;k x;kA

uksV % mijksDr eky i`Fkd~&i`Fkd~ ekSds ij tIr fd, x, rFkk dV~Vs------ ¼ukWV fdy;j½ fd, x,A**




4. Besides, Dr. Vijay Kumar Diwan (PW5) has also found 40 pellets, one plastic rim and one disc from the right lung of the deceased, Balkishan. As per medical report, the deceased Balkishan sustained fire arm injuries on his body. The nature of injuries were suff













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top