Back
SUBHASH KAKADE
Pyari Bai Namdev – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwandas Pandey – Respondent
1. This revision under section 19(4) Family Courts Act, 1984 read with section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' for short) has been filed by the applicant/wife against the order dated 21.12.2010, passed in M.J.C. No.361/2009, by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur, wherein learned Family Court rejected the application for grant of maintenance amount.
The brown fox jumps over the laxy dog.
2. The applicant had filed an application under the provisions of section 125 of the Code, contending that the marriage between the applicant and the respondent was solemnized on 13.5.1952 at Barela, Jabalpur as per the Hindu rites and rituals. Six sons and one daughter were born out of the wedlock and all children got married and are living happily with their family separately. The behavior of the respondent was cruel-some, hence, the applicant was living separately since 2006. The respondent used to give some maintenance amount to survive the applicant but from the month of February, 2009 the respondent stopped to give any amount on account of wrong advise of her son Ramkumar and his wife Saraswati. Due to weaker financial co
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
