SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 286

M.C.GARG
Lakhan – Appellant
Versus
Archana Lodhi and others – Respondent


ORDER

1. This civil revision has been filed by the applicant against the order granting maintenance to widowed daughter-in-law by the father-in-law (applicant) under section 19 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act.

2. According to the applicant, in the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, there is no provision for maintenance. Of course, after coming to the course of the Family Courts Act, an appeal is now provided to its earlier order which was passed by the Family Court which may include such an order. However the question remains as to whether against an order passed under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act not by a Family Court but by an ordinarily civil Court if an appeal is not provided then what is the remedy.

3. According to the applicant, answer is given by the apex Court in the case of Sadhana Lodhi v. National Insurance Company Limited, reported in 2003 Legal Eagle (SC) 86. In the aforesaid judgment, the apex Court has held as follows:-

“Even if where a remedy by way of an appeal has not been provided for against the order and judgment of a District Judge, the remedy available to the aggrieved person is to file a revision before the High Court under section 115 of th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top