Back
S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Ganesh Prasad Ojha – Appellant
Versus
Shri Hariram Ji Ojha – Respondent
1. The petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 14.3.2012 passed in case No.COS 50-A/2011 by the 14th Civil Judge Class-II, Gwalior rejecting the application under Order 6 rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short “the code”) for amendment in the plaint, has filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. The petitioner/plaintiff had instituted a civil suit for the declaration of title, permanent injunction and for cancellation of Will on the ground that the disputed property (agricultural land and residential house) is his ancestral property and the petitioner/plaintiff and the defendants No.1 and 2 have 1/3 (each) share in the property.
3. A written-statement was filed by the defendants. The respondent No.1/ defendant admitted the plaint allegations whereas respondent No.2 to 4/defendants denied the plaint allegations claiming themselves to be the exclusive owners and in possession of the suit property. On the basis of the pleadings, the trial Court framed as many as five issues and fixed the case for evidence of the plaintiff.
4. An application under Order 6 rule 17 read with section 151 of the Code was filed before the trial Court whic
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
