SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 950

JARAT KUMAR JAIN
Bahadur Singh S/o Dev Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Ramchran S/o Babulal Chamar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Akash Rathi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Virendra Patel, Advocate

ORDER :

Jarat Kumar Jain, J.

This application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Code") has been filed against order dated 08/01/2015, passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Shajapur in Criminal Revision NO. 133/2014, whereby directed the Magistrate to take the cognisance against the petitioner for the offence mentioned in the complaint.

2. Brief facts of this case are that the respondent/complainant has filed a complaint against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 390, 392, 394, 327 & 166 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(v) and (vii) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act). After considering the statements of the complainant and the witnesses and the result of investigation the Magistrate found that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding, therefore, vide order dated 13/05/2014 dismissed the complaint. Against this order the respondent has filed the revision under Section 397/401 of the code, learned IInd ASJ, Shajapur by the impugned order allowed the revision and directed the Magistrate that there is prima facie ground for taking cognisance against the petitioner for the offence mentioned in the complaint. Being aggrieved with this or












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top