SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 506

SANJAY YADAV
Halka Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
Pyarelal Kachhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Anoop Saxena for petitioner;
Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.14.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. Petitioner/plaintiff claiming right over the suit property through their common ancestor Sardar Kushwaha sought declaration of title over the suit property detailed in paragraphs 2(a) and 2(b) of the plaint, situated at village Ramtoriya, Patwari Halka No.5. Revenue Circle Village Ghuwara, Tahsil Bada Malehara, District Chhatarpur and for the relief that the sale deeds executed on 5.9.2012, 13.9.2012, 17.9.2012, 1.10.2012 and 3.1.2013 be declared null and void and the decree passed on 24.12.2002 in Civil Suit No.49-A/1999 as null and void being obtained by playing fraud and for setting aside the order of mutation. The trial Court taking into consideration the number of plaintiffs and a finding that several causes of action have been joined (in context to the different sale deed) in the suit as permissible, under Order 2 rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; however, taking note of the decision of our High Court in Rakesh Gautam and others v. State of M.P. and others [ILR (2011) MP 2734], directed for payment of separate court-fees by each of the plaintiff.

3. Evidently, the case of Rakesh Gautam (supra), was a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top