Back
ALOK VERMA
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This criminal revision is directed against the order passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Mhow, District Indore in Sessions Trial No.380/2015 dated 19.1.2016 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed an application field by defence counsel Shri Salam Mehar, to call the complaint case filed by complainant- Rajesh and Maansingh against the accused persons Gopal, Rajesh and Subhash being counter case of the sessions trial pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge opined in the impugned order that there is a difference in time of the incident. According to the FIR in the sessions trial, the incident took place at 7.00 a.m. while in the complaint case, time of incident is said to be 7.30 a.m. Also the spot where the incident allegedly took place is different in the complaint case. The house of Gopal in front of which the incident was said to have taken place was not shown by the Investigating Officer in the site map and in this view of the matter, the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the incident took place in a same tra
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
