SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 513

ROHIT ARYA
Dushyant Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Petitioner while serving as Sub-Registrar in District Shivpuri in the year 2005 was incharge of registration of various nature of documents including mining leases and calculation of stamp duty under the provisions of Indian Stamp Act and Registration Act. Thirteen mining leases were registered under his orders. Upon scrutiny of instruments by the audit party during the course of audit, it was pointed out that substantially less stamp duty as well as registration fee has been charged on each instruments causing revenue loss to the extent of Rs.6,66,235/-. As a result, petitioner is served with the charge sheet under rule 14 of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1966'). The aforesaid conduct of the petitioner is found to be misconduct within the meaning of rules 3(1) (i) (ii) (iii) of the M.P. Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1965. The charge sheet is under challenge before this Court on the grounds that :

(i) There is no malice attributed to the petitioner and, therefore, even if less stamp duty and registration fee has been charged, the same shall not tantamount to misconduct making petitioner lia










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top