SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 469

SANJAY YADAV
Shamim Bano – Appellant
Versus
Manager – Respondent


Advocates:
Monesh Sahu for petitioner;
Anoop Nair for respondent.

ORDER

With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

1 Only issue which arises for consideration is as to whether the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court having held that the domestic enquiry leading to termination of the petitioner being vitiated was justified in only giving compensation instead of directing for reinstatement with back wages.

2. Appointed in 1973 in Eklehra Colliery the petitioner was promoted as Trammer and as Clipman-IV. That while posted at Gajandoh Colliery, petitioner was proceeded against with the issuance of charge sheet. The charges levelled against him were that of theft, fraud, dishonesty with employers business and property, culminating in order of dismissal which led the petitioner raise an industrial dispute which being not resolved in conciliation resulted in reference to CGIT for adjudication as to ‘whether the action of the management of Gajandoh Mine of Western Coal Fields Limited in dismissing the services of Shri Faiyazuddin clipman w.e.f. 11.11.1992 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

3. CGIT by order dated 11.8.2014 set aside the domestic enquiry on the finding






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top