S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Balram – Appellant
Versus
Ravishankar – Respondent
1. Heard.
2. In this review petition, the petitioner has sought review of the order dated 19.12.2016 passed in Writ Petition No.8759/2016 whereby the writ petition was disposed of at admission stage itself without issuing notice to the other side i.e. present review petitioner with direction that the respondent No.2/petitioner shall prefer the application for compounding within two days. In case, such application is preferred before the competent authority i.e. Municipal Corporation, the same shall be decided by speaking and reasoned order within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
3. The grievance of the review petitioner is that the respondent No.1 has raised illegal construction to the extent that the road has been narrowed down and petitioner and other persons are facing difficulty in regular movement. Since the respondent No.2 did not remove the illegal construction, the petitioner filed an application under section 307(5) of M.P. Municipal Corporation Act. The said application was decided on 28.10.2015, whereby, respondent No.2 was ordered to remove the illegal construction raised by the respondent No.1. The said
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.