SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 728

ANJULI PALO
Nitiraj @ Badda Lodhi – Appellant
Versus
Prahlad – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Adhikari with Jagat Singh for applicant; S.D. Mishra for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed by the applicant so called father of the minor respondent being aggrieved by order dated 9.9.2016 passed in Criminal Revision No.100013/2015 whereby the learned revisional Court has upheld the order of the learned Magistrate dated 11.12.2014 passed in Case No.46/2013 under section 125 of CrPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant was having a love affair with the mother of the respondent Preeti Lodhi. The respondent was born as a consequence their bodily relationship and thereafter, the applicant refused to accept and take responsibility of Preeti Lodhi and the respondent (minor son).

3. Preeti Lodhi desired to become the lawfully wedded wife of the applicant. She filed a report in the Police Station of Gotegaon, District Narsinghpur accusing the applicant of raping her, but the applicant was acquitted from the charge.

4. The respondent has filed an application for maintenance under section 125 of CrPC against the applicant in the Court of JMFC Court, Narsingpur. The applicant has denied that the respondent is his son, vide order dated 11.12.2014 learned trial Court decided the case in favour of the respondent, declaring the applica











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top