SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 737

SUSHIL KUMAR PALO
Renu Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Atul Bhargav – Respondent


Advocates:
Sankalp Kochar for petitioner; Mujahid Ali Khan for respondent No.1; S.K. Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2/State.

ORDER

1. This petition under section 482 of CrPC has been filed to assail the order dated 15.9.2016 passed by the First ASJ, Chhindwara in Criminal Revision No.2500078/2016, wherein the order dated 3.8.2016 passed by JMFC, Chhindwara in Criminal Case No.1206/2010 has been affirmed.

2. Brief facts of the case requisite for disposal of this petition are that, the petitioner is facing trial under sections 427, 457, 323, 506-I read with section 34 of IPC. In the complaint case, after the examination of the accused, petitioner filed an application for examining herself and calling Subodh Malviya, Head Constable incharge of the Cyber Cell in the office of Superintendent of Police, Chhindwara to bring with him the details of Atul Bhargava Mobile No.9826147899 to Mobile No.9425306129, call details of Prashant Mobile No.942469919 and Shiv Saxena Mobile No.9425146706. The said application was disallowed by learned JMFC on 3.8.2016. The same was agitated in Criminal Revision No.2500078/2016 was filed before First ASJ, Chhindwara, wherein the same has been disallowed on 15.9.2016.

3. Brief facts just necessary for disposal of this petition are that, criminal complaint case has been filed by Atul
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top