SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 787

SUJOY PAUL
Babulal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Neeraj Dubey for petitioner.

ORDER

1. Shri Neeraj Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Heard.

3. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 8.11.2017 whereby the application filed by the defendants No.1 and 2 under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed by the Court below and Shri Surendra Gaur is permitted to be examined on behalf of defendants No.1 and 2 being a witness to the Will.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner assailed it on the ground that the Court below by order dated 26.10.2017 Annexure P-2 closed the evidence and fixed the matter for final hearing on 13.10.2017. The defendants No.1 and 2 filed an application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 3.11.2017 and the said application was erroneously allowed by the Court below.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a plain reading of application Annexure P-4 shows that the date and source of information regarding the availability of the proposed witness Shri Surendra Gaur is not pleaded and established. Thus, the defendant has not shown 'due diligence' before the Court below. Hence, the Court below has wrongly allowed the application by the imp








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top