SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 811

VED PRAKASH SHARMA
Lalit Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Kartik Mandloi for petitioner;
A.S. Sisodia, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision petition preferred under section 397/401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') calls in question the legality, propriety and correctness of order dated 8.11.2016 passed by 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in Sessions Trial No. 558/2016, whereby the charge for offence under section 306 read with section 107 of the IPC has been framed against the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has been charge sheeted in connection with death of one Anjali, wife of Prakash, who consumed poisonous substance on 14th November, 2015 and died as a result thereof on 16th November, 2015. The prosecution case is that Anjali (deceased), who was acquainted with the petitioner, persuaded her sister to lend Rs.15,000/- to him. However, the petitioner neither returned the principal amount, nor the interest accrued thereon. Allegedly, when Anjali (deceased) threatened the petitioner, that in case, he fails to repay the money and interest, she will die, then the petitioner responded saying that he is not going to return the money even if she dies.

3. As per prosecution, dying declaration of the deceased was recorded by Executive Magistrate on 15.11.2015, in which the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top