1. Petitioner takes exception to the order 31.10.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.17782/2017, wherein learned Single Judge taking into consideration that the representation directed to be decided by the Commissioner, Land Records in pursuance to the order dated 30.8.2017 passed in Writ Petition No. 4761/2017, did not consider the precise grievance raised by the petitioner, disposed of the writ petition by impugned order with a direction to the Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement to pass a reasoned order on the representation preferred by the petitioner.

2. The grievance raised by the appellant against the said order is that learned Single Judge ought to have extended the interim protection which was granted to him by order dated 30.8.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.4761/2017 and ought to have held that till the representation is decided, the petitioner/appellant be not transferred from Gwalior to Panna.

3. We note the contention and reject it at the outset in view of the decision by a Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.552/2015 (Mridul Kumar Sharma v. State of M.P.) [2015(III) MPWN 25], decided on 3.8.2015, wherein it is held:-

“2. The argument before us is that the learned S