Back
NANDITA DUBEY
Archana Gaidam – Appellant
Versus
Swapnik Gaidam – Respondent
1. By way of instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 25.9.2017, passed by the trial Court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under section 65B of the Evidence Act has been rejected.
2. According to the petitioner, an application under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the respondent/husband seeking divorce from the petitioner on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The petitioner tendered her appearance and filed her reply. The petitioner has also filed an application under section 65 of the Evidence Act, whereby some photographs, which she allegedly had obtained from the computer of respondent, showing him in relation with another girl and copy of audio and video recording, uploaded in the pendrive along with a self verified certificate that she has obtained the photographs from the laptop of her husband and the recording from her husband's mobile.
3. The respondent has objected the same by filing a reply.
4. The trial Court after considering the documents, the photographs and the pendrive, dismissed the application holding that the petitioner has not followed the procedure prescribed under section 65B of the Evidence Act
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
