SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 36

VANDANA KASREKAR
Tarabati Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Shyam Yadav for petitioner;
N. S. Chouhan, Government Advocate for respondents/ State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the resolution dated 24.6.2017 as well as letter dated 28.6.2017 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Shahdol by which the petitioner has been removed from the post of Sarpanch after passing no-confidence motion.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the election of Village Panchayat Chandrapur, Janpad Panchayat Burhar, District Shahdol was conducted in the year 2015 and thec petitioner has been elected as Sarpanch of the said Gramc Panchayat. On 25.2.2015, the Sub Divisional Officer has published a notification under section 90 thereby declaring the petitioner as elected for the post of Sarpanch. The petitioner, thereafter, performing her work properly and without any complaint. The Secretary of the Gram Panchayat has committed some irregularity with the fund of Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has, therefore, raised an objection with respect to that irregularity, therefore, the elected Panch of the Gram Panchayat has submitted a notice of no-confidence motion of Sarpanch in the month of January, 2017. After receiving the notice of no-confidence, the prescribed authority has fixed the date for meeting in Gramsabha on
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top