SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 572

VANDANA KASREKAR
Fajal Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Syed Sultan Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ankit Saxena, Adv., Sameer Seth, Adv.

JUDGMENT

VANDANA KASREKAR, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the orders dated 05.10.2017 as well as dated 13.09.2017 passed by the trial Court.

2. At the time of the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition so far as, the order dated 05.10.2017 is concerned.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of order dated 05.10.2017.

4. The petitioner has filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 13.09.2017 passed by 12th Civil Judge Class-II, Bhopal in RCS No. 488-A/2016 by which the trial Court has dismissed the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 10 of the C.P.C.

5. The petitioner/defendant has filed a suit for specific performance of contract which was registered as RCS No. 462-A/2016. Thereafter, the respondent/plaintiff has also filed a civil suit for eviction which was registered as RCS No. 488-A/2016. On receiving the notice, the petitioner has filed an application under Section 10 of the C.P.C. whereby he has raised a specific ground for stay of the s









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top