ANAND PATHAK
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Writ Petition No. 5794/2013 and 6619/2013 were heard on same date and kept reserved for orders. After keeping those writ petitions reserved, on a later date, Writ Petition No. 238/2014 was also heard and looking to similar nature of controversy, all the petitions are decided by a common order, just to avoid the repetition and to preserve the resources.
2. Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 6619/2013 (respondent No. 2 in Writ Petition No. 5794/2013) is seeking relief in the form of direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to make payment of compensation to the petitioner along with penal interest.
3. Facts of Writ Petition No. 5794/2013 are taken into consideration initially. Thereafter, facts of Writ Petition No. 238/2014 are taken separately in succeeding paragraphs.
4. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners/ Union of India being crestfallen by the order dated 30th July, 2013 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Gwalior whereby as per the allegations, respondent No. 1 proceeded with the order without noticing the petitioners and without giving any opportunity of hearing and the amount of Rs. 4,60,00,000/- has been awarded as compensati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.