SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 593

SUSHIL KUMAR PALO
Makhan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Shweta Yadav for applicants;
S. D. Khan, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision has been filed under section 397 read with section 401 of CrPC, wherein challenge has been made to order dated 29.8.2017 passed by IIIrd A.S.J., Sagar in Sessions Trial No. 131/2017, whereby the learned trial Court has framed charges for offence under section 306 read with section 34 of the IPC against the applicants/accused persons.

2. Bereft of the unnecessary details, the facts requisite for the disposal of this revision are that, Makhan Singh informed the Police, Naryawali on 17.2.2015 that, his cousin Nannu @ Nandram Yadav died due to crush by the train near village Bhatua. The dead body was lying in the railway track. Merg No. 04/2015 was lodged. During the inquest statements of Makhan Singh, mother of deceased Radha Rani, brother of deceased Ramji, Rakesh Yadav, Satyanarayan Yadav, Rambaran Yadav, Rohan Singh Yadav and others recorded, other witnesses Ramnath, Kissu @ Kesav, Narendra and Jagbhan were also recorded. Call details were traced.

3. After the inquest, it was found that the deceased and the accused persons were having a land dispute. On 16.2.2015, deceased Nannu @ Nandram had gone to a place at Naryawali for meals (pangat) along with the accus































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top