SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 646

S.K.GANGELE, ANJULI PALO
Indu Chourasiya – Appellant
Versus
Trilok Chourasiya – Respondent


Advocates:
Shyam Yadav for appellant; Ghanshayam Pandey for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Gangele, J. -- 1. Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 14.07.2017 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur in C.S.No. 412-A/2016. By the aforesaid judgment, the trial Court allowed the application filed by the respondent and granted a decree of divorce.

2. The marriage of the appellant-wife and respondenthusband was solemnÁed on 30.4.2013 as per Hindu rituals at Jabalpur. The appellant lived with the respondent for a brief period. She returned to her maternal house on 25.7.2013. It is pleaded by the respondent in the plaint that he had tried his best to pursue the appellant to live with him. However, she did not come back. Thereafter, respondent-husband filed an application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 3.3.2014. After receiving notice of the aforesaid application, the appellant-wife lodged FIR on 1.5.2014 against the respondent, his father Ramesh, mother Asha, sister Deepika and uncle Hiralal Chourasiya. On the basis of the aforesaid FIR, offence under sections 498A, 506 B, 406 and 34 of Indian Penal Code was registered against the respondent and his family. They were arrested and thereafter, respondent-husband was released























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top