SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 687

VIVEK RUSIA
Kapil – Appellant
Versus
Shekhar – Respondent


Advocates:
Vijay Singh Chouhan for appellant, Hemant Vaishnav for respondent No. 1 and 2 Pradeep Gupta for respondent No. 3.

ORDER

1. Present appeal has been filed under section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the award dated 22.7.2015 passed in Claim Case No. 53/2015, by which the MACT, Barwani.

2. Present appellant met with an accident on 17.3.2013 at 7.30 p.m. by Maruti Van bearing registration No. MP-09-BB-0126 owned by respondent No. 1 and driven by respondent No. 2. Due to the said accident, the appellant received internal injuries and immediately admitted in the primary health centre, Rajpur. The accident was reported to the police by way of MLC, thereafter, he was referred to the District Hospital, Barwani and further referred to Indore. The appellant was hospitalÁed in Mayank Hospital for the period from 18.3.2013 to 26.3.2013. The FIR was recorded on 28.3.2013 under sections 279 and 337 of IPC against the driver of the offending vehicle. The appellant filed claim case before the MACT claiming compensation of Rs. 12,50,000/-. After notice, the defendant No. 1 and 2 appeared and did not dispute the involvement of the vehicle in the accident and further submitted that the vehicle was insured and therefore, the Insurance Company is liable to pay the compensation.

3. Respondent No. 3 / In











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top