SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 1108

S.B.SAKRIKAR
Tawar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : J.W. Mahajan
For the Non-applicant : V. Maheshwari

Applicant-Defendant has directed this Revision against the order dated 3.7.1999 rendered by Addl. District Judge. Indore in Civil Suit No. 74/86 thereby rejecting application filed by the applicant u/s. 65 of the Evidence Act for granting permission to lead secondary evidence with regard to the copies of the Promissory Notes Ex. B-1, B-2, B-3 filed on behalf of the applicant.

Briefly stated the facts of the case are one Ranjitsingh since deceased brought a suit for possession against the petitioner from the top floor of the house bearing Municipality House No. 11, situated at Meerapath, Indore, Non-applicants Nos. 1 to 3 are the LRs of the deceased-plaintiff Ranjitsingh. In the said suit, the applicant-defendant contended that he is in possession of the portion of the suit house on the basis of the past contract with the owner of the suit house one Smt. Maltibai Holkar. He contended that in part performance of the said contract with Maltibai, the petitioner paid Rs. 75,000/- to the vendor who returned the promissory notes executed by the petitioner in her favour by discharging the same under the signature. The petitioner also contended that more than one lakh rupees were spent in re








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top