FAKHRUDDIN
Shyam Narain Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
The impugned order dated 29.5.2000 was passed by the trial Court in a Criminal Misc. Case No. 64/95 (State of M.P. v. Sukka and others), in which an application was made by the' present petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of self-illness, which was rejected by the impugned order and certain remarks were also passed against the petitioner/Advocate. The trial Court in the impugned order aforesaid also noted that the counsel has not been appearing from 9.3.96 onwards and nor he has filed memo of appearance on the record. While rejecting the application, the following remarks were passed by the trial Court as under:
vr% Li"V gS fd Jh ';keukjk;.k f=ikBh ,MoksdsV vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls U;k;ky; ls Ny djrs gq, vfHk;qDrx.k dh iSjoh muds }kjk iwoZ esa fu;qDr vf/koDrk dh tkudkjh ds fcuk rFkk vukifr izkIr fd, fcuk U;k;ky; esa dj jgs gS tks vf/koDrk vf/kfu;e] 1961 ds varZxr dnkpj.k dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSaA Jh ';keukj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.