SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 786

ANAND PATHAK
Ritu Singhal – Appellant
Versus
Mukul Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P.C. Chandil for petitioners; R.K. Sharma with Mahendra Chudhary for respondent.

ORDER

1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under section 482 of the CrPC against the orders dated 9.10.2018 passed by IX Additional Sessions Judge Gwalior in Cr. Revision No. 299 of 2018 preferred by the petitioners whereby, the revision preferred by the petitioners has been dismissed and the order of cognizance taken by S.D.M Court dated 1.8.2018 is affirmed.

2. Precisely stated, facts of the case are that the petitioners and respondents are owners and in possession of a common building in which ground floor shop at More Bazar Lashker Gwalior is of the ownership of the respondents and first floor over it, is of ownership of the petitioners. It is submitted by the petitioners that since building was old, both the parties decided to get it dismantled and thereafter to reconstruct the building.

3. After demolition of the building it was the duty of the respondents to construct the ground floor and thereafter the petitioners had to construct their building over the ground floor. In pursuance thereto, (as per oral agreement), the petitioners demolished their part of the building but the respondents did not follow the oral agreement and continued with the in-habitation of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top