SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 1642

J.K.MAHESHWARI
Mohammad Juned – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vivek Singh.
For the Respondent: R.S. Bais.

ORDER :

1. This revision under Section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 15.05.2013 passed by the Sessions judge Ratlam in Sessions Trial No. 13/2013, relegating the trial for adjudication by the Special Judge notified under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as Prevention of Atrocities Act). In the present case an offence was registered at Crime No. 96/2013 by Police Station industrial Area, Ratlam under Section 363, 366, 342, 506-B & 376-D of IPC and also under Section 5(g), 6 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "POCSO Act") and Section 3 (1) (xi) of the Prevention of Atrocities Act, wherein challan was filed in the court of sessions notified as "Children's Court."

2. Shri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the cognizance had taken by the Court of Sessions, notified under POCSO Act, which is transferred by Sessions Judge, Ratlam vide order dated 15.05.2013 to the Special Judge notifi































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top