P.K.JAISWAL, M.C.GARG
Arun Khare – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
M.C. Garg, JJ.
1. All these appeals have been filed against the common judgment delivered on 25th January, 2004 in Sessions Trial No. 08/1994 by Special Judge, C.B.I. (Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988) and 6th A.S.J. Indore in which challans were filed separately based upon the investigation conducted by C.B.I. on R.C. No. 8 (A)/91-BPL and by which the accused Arun Khare, Prakash Nandedkar, Arvind Bhide, Pallavi Nandedkar, Ramesh Wankhede, Kaushal Ladia, Viney Majumdar, Murlidhar Demlani, Manohar Manglani and Girish Telang, were convicted under section 420 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years with fine of Rs. 1000/- each in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for three months each. All of them have also been convicted under section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to undergo one year R.I. with fine of Rs. 1000/- each; in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months each. Accused Arun Khare and Arvind Bhide were also convicted under sections 13(1)(D) read with section 13(2) of the P.C. Act and have been sentenced to under
B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana
C.B.I. vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. 1996 CrLJ 3501
C.B.I. vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. AIR 1996 SC 2452
Manoj Sharma vs. State and Others
Mir Naqvi Askari vs. C.B.I. (2009) 15 SCC 643
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.