SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 80

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava for applicant; Avnish Singh, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 12.11.2018 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Sironj, District Vidisha in Sessions Trial No. 79/2018, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under sections 227 and 228 of CrPC has been rejected and charges under sections 294, 323 or section 323 read with sections 34, 326 or section 326 read with section 34 and 506 (Part-II) of Indian Penal Code, were framed against the petitioners.

2. The facts leading to filing of the instant revision application are that on 5.11.2017 FIR was lodged by complainant Lekhraj alleging that in the evening at 5 pm on 5.11.2017, complainant, his brother Lakhan and mother Kripa Bai were working on their agricultural field, at that time the buffaloes of the complainant went inside the agricultural field of Ram Singh, on which Ram Singh, Rajesh and Mahendra Singh started hurling abuses and thereafter son of Ram Singh namely Vakeel and Sonu assaulted complainant Lekhraj by lathi and Ram Singh, Rajesh and Mahendra assaulted Lakhan, and Ram Singh, Vakeel and Sonu assaulted Kripa B























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top