SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 117

VIVEK RUSIA
Mahesh Palod – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (License) – Respondent


Advocates:
Ayush Jain for petitioner; Aniket A. Naik for responents.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by order dated 26.4.2017, passed by the Asst. Commissioner (License) Municipal Corporation, Indore, (respondent No.1) whereby the application submitted by him in order to obtain Money Lenders licence under section 11-B of the Madhya Pradesh Money-Lenders Act, 1934, has been rejected.

3. Facts of the case in short are as under :

The petitioner is permanent resident of Indore and the Municipal Corporation Indore is body incorporated under the provisions of Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, represented through Commissioner. According to the petitioner, in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09 he had a license to do the money lending business Thereafter, he submitted an application on 24.1.2014, before the respondents for obtaining the registration certificate of money lending license . Thereafter, he again submitted an application on 1.8.2015 in prescribed format along with the requisite fee. Thereafter, he visited the office of respondents and also served a legal notice. Despite of the aforesaid, when his application was not considered he filed a Writ Petition No. 6259/2016 before this high Court . By order dated 9






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top