SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 126

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, VIVEK RUSIA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Sonu Jatav – Respondent


Advocates:
Rahul Vijaywargiya for appellant/State.

ORDER

Rusia, J -- 1. Heard on I. A. No. 1736/2019 an application for condonation of delay.

2. As per office objection, the appeal is barred by 269 days.

3. According to the appellant, against the impugned order dated 11.4.2018, Review Petition was filed which has been dismissed vide order dated 29.8.2018. Thereafter, legal opinion was sought from the Govt. Advocate which was received on 9.10.2018 and sent to the Law Department. Vide order dated 04.12.2018, the Law Department granted the permission to file writ appeal which was received by the OIC on 27.12.2018, thereafter, writ appeal was prepared and filed before this Court.

4. Considering the aforesaid procedure delay and contents of application as supported by an affidavit of Office-in-Charge of the Case , the delay in filing of this appeal is hereby condoned.

5. Also heard on the question of admission.

6. The appellant/State of Madhya Pradesh and others ( respondents in the writ petition) have filed the present appeal being aggrieved by order dated 11.4.2018 passed in Writ Petition No. 1273/2017 whereby the writ petition was allowed by giving direction to the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for compensate appoin













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top