Sarnam Singh Kushwah vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(MP) 898

SHEEL NAGU
Sarnam Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Neeraj Shrivastava and R. P. Singh for petitioner, A. K. Nirankari, Government Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 5; M. P. Agarwal for respondents No. 3 and 10; V. K. Sharma for respondent No. 7; Prateep Visoriya for respondent No. 8; Manish Sharma for respondent No. 9;

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India prays for the following reliefs:

¼7-1½ fiVh'kuj }kjk izLrqr orZeku fjV fiVh'ku Lohdkj djrs gq,] fookfnr vkns'k fnukad 2-1-2018] 20-11-2017 ,oa 9-6-2017 vusXtj ih-1 lhjht mlls vU; izfrdwy vkns'k tks fookfnr vkns'kksa ls mRiUu gq, gkas] dks fujLr@vikLr djrs gq, foHkkxh; izkfËkdkfj;ksa@fjLiksUMsUV~l dks vknsf'kr@funsZf'kr djus dh d`ik djsa fd fiVh'kuj lsokfuo`fÙk ds mijkar feyus Lohd`r ,oa vuqeksfnr ekfld isU'ku eas ls fdlh Hkh izdkj dh olwyh ugha djsa ,oa isU'ku esa ls olwy dh xbZ jkf'k dks fuèkkZfjr C;kt lfgr fiVh'kuj dks okfil iznku djsaA

¼7-2½ fiVh'kuj ds lsokfgr ykHkksa isU'ku esa ls ;fn dksbZ olwyh fd, tkus ds vkns'k@funsZ'k lssokiqfLrdk esa vk{ksi ¼vkifRr½ tks fd fiVh'kuj ds fo#) gksa fujLr@vikLr fd, tkus dh —ik djsaA

¼7-3½ vU; mfpr fjV] vknasa'k vFkok funsZ'k U;k; fgr esa fiVh'kuj ds i{k esa tkjh djus dh Ñik djsa] izdj.k O;; fjLiksUMsUV~l ls fnyk, tkus dh d`ik djsaAß

2. Bare facts giving rise to the present case are that challenge was made to recovery of amount of Rs. 4,52,440/- from pensionary benefits of petitioner who on attained the age of superannuation on 31.10.2011 from the post of Librarian at Governm