G.S.AHLUWALIA
Upendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kamruddian – Respondent
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 12.10.2017 passed by the Board of Revenue in Revision No. 2324-PBR/2015, by which the orders of mutation dated 19.3.1991, 14.12.1992, 27.1.1993 and 7.3.2005 passed by Revenue Authorities have been set aside.
2. It is the contention of the petitioners that on the strength of sale deed dated 26.7.1990, one Hasina Begum got her name mutated in the revenue records by order dated 19.3.1991. This order was challenged by filing an appeal before the SDO, which was allowed by order dated 14.12.1992 and the matter was remanded back. Thereafter, the said Hasina Begum challenged the order of the SDO, before the Court of Collector, which was dismissed by order dated 27.1.1993 and the second revision filed by Hasina Begum was also dismissed by Additional Commissioner, Gwalior Division, Gwalior by order dated 7.3.2005. Thereafter, the Naib Tahsildar on the basis of sale deed dated 26.7.1990, mutated the names of the petitioners by order dated 25.1.2007. This order was passed after granting opportunity of hearing to Hasina Begum. Thereafter, the appeal was dismissed by SDO by order dated 15.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.