SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 147

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Balram Bairagi – Appellant
Versus
Prabha Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Arvind Dudawat for applicant; Harish Dixit, Government Advocate for respondent No. 6/State; D.D. Bansal for respondent No. 7.

ORDER

1. This civil revision under section 115 of CPC has been filed against the order dated 12.9.2018 passed by Third Civil Judge, Class-II, Ganj Basoda, District Vidisha in Civil Suit RCSA No. 47/2009, by which the application filed by the applicant under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC has been rejected.

2. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present revision in short are that the respondent No. 7 has filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. It is the case of the respondent No. 7 that he is the owner of the land bearing survey Nos. 346, 347, 348 and 349 ad-measuring 4.818 hectares, situated in village Jhilipura, Tahsil Gang Basoda, District Vidisha, however, the name of the Collector has wrongly been mutated as a Manager, as the said land was never allotted to the temple.

3. An application was filed under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaintiff/respondent No. 7 has filed a suit in respect of the land, which is recorded in the name of Temple Mahadev Ji and in this temple slippers (Charan Paduka) of Guru Nanak and Shreechand have been kept. The suit land belongs to the deity and the suit by a deity without its













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top