SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1237

ANJULI PALO
Bachchu Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.K. Verma.
For the Respondent: Ramesh Kushwaha.

ORDER :

1. This petition under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code has been preferred being aggrieved by the order dated 2-1-2017 passed by the Special Judge District Sidhi in Special Case No. 13/2016, whereby an application under section 311 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 filed by the applicant has been rejected.

2. In short the prosecution case is that the applicant committed rape on the prosecutrix and due to which the complainant became pregnant. She conceived a child of 7 months. She narrated the incident to her parents on 16-3-2016, then they lodged the First Information Report at Police Station, AJK, Sidhi.

3. The learned trial Court framed charges under sections 376, 506-B of Indian Penal Code and 3(2)(5) of Atrocity Act and section 3/4 of POCSO Act against the applicant. During trial the applicant found that necessary questions and suggestion could not be asked to PW-3 (Khumbhdas) and (PW-4) prosecutrix which are important for fair trial.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed reliance upon a judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State vs. Thukchuk Lachugpa and Another, 2005 Cr. L.J. 201 (Sikkim) wherein it was held that if the prosecution or defence h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top