SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1233

ATUL SREEDHARAN
Rajpal S/o Jitram Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashok Lalwani.
For the Respondent: G.S. Thakur.

ORDER :

1. Mr. Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.

2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioners who are directors of M/s Ess Pee Dhatu Udyog, which is a company duly incorporated under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 are stated to have indulged in the theft of electricity amounting to Rs. 2,99,000,00/-.

3. The facts of the case are at page-39 of the petition which is the complaint made to the T.I. of Police Station-Lodhikheda (M.P.). In the said complaint, it is revealed that upon an inspection on 4-10-1998 at 4:00 A.M. by the D.I.G (V and S) of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Jabalpur (M.P.) the cables leading to the meter box are alleged to have been found tampered with and the insulation is shown as having being removed. Under the circumstances the Electricity Board arrived at the conclusion that electricity could be shorted from the line directly without passing through the meter. At page-40 is the assessment of the loss which prima-facie appears to be speculative even as per the case of the prosecution itself in which the Electricity Board states that.............The quas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top