VIVEK RUSIA
MADHUSUDAN CHOUHAN – Appellant
Versus
SANGEETA MATHUR – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Shri Amit Singh Sisodia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Padmanabh Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent.
The applicant has filed the present petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the order dated 13-1-2015 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam whereby the revision has been dismissed and the order dated 12-7-2011 passed by the JMFC, Ratlam in Criminal Case No. 1276/2009 taking cognizance under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code has been affirmed.
2. Facts of the case, in short, are as under:
3. The respondent filed an application under section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the JMFC, Ratlam seeking cognizance against the present petitioner, his wife and son under sections 408, 417, 420, 487, 488, 471, 120-B of Indian Penal Code. As per averment made in the complaint, the respondent and the petitioner are known to each other since 2004. At that time, the son of the present petitioner was living in Jaipur (Rajasthan). The respondent was also residing in Jaipur (Rajasthan). The present petitioner used to visit Jaipur to meet his son Aniket who was studying BDS in Jaipur. As, the son of the petitioner was l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.