SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 699

S.L.KOCHAR
Rewaram – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.Y.Mehta, J.B.Dave, Vivek Singh,

Judgment

( 1. ) HEARD on admission. Admit. With the consent of the parties, the revision is heard finally. The applicants have filed this revision against the impugned order dated 14-7-2004 passed by Special Judge, Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Cr. R. No. 75/2004, whereby allowed the revision and ordered for registration of offence against the applicants under Section 506 of IPC and Section 3 (1) (10) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the Act"), thereby setting aside the order passed by JMFC, Maheshwar, District Khargone in Private Complaint Case No. 94/2004 on 10-3-2004.

( 2. ) THE non-applicant No. 2 has filed the complaint against the applicants for the offences under Sections 294,504,323,506-11 of IPC and under Section 3 (1) (10) of the Act. The learned Trial Court, alter recording the statement of complainant and his witnesses under Sections 200 and 202, Cr. PC and also called the police report under Section 156 (3) of the Cr. PC registered the complaint only under Sections 294, 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC and did not register the offence under Section 3 (1) (10) of the Act. Aga












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top