Back
S.K.PALO
RAMLAL PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Mr. L. C. Chourasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Nayak, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.
2. The petitioner is claiming to be the registered owner of Truck bearing registration No. UP-63/AT-0098. The vehicle has been seized at Police Station Bahri, on 5-3-2018 in connection with crime No. 84/2018 for offence under sections 379, 414 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code, sections 4 and 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, sections 27, 29, 39 D and 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and sections 2, 41, 52 of the Forest Act and also under sections 3/4 of the Public Safety Act, 1953.
3. On filing an application for releasing the vehicle on Supurdnama before the J.M.F.C, Siddhi, the same was dismissed on 14-3-2018. The petitioner preferred Criminal Revision No. 46/2018, the same has also been dismissed on 22-3-2018. Therefore, the present petition for releasing of the vehicle on supurdnama.
4. It is also contended that the petitioner is prepared to abide all the conditions imposed by the Court for release of the vehicle.
5. Considering the fact that tria
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
