ANAND PATHAK
AJIT KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Shri Anil Kumar Mishra and Shri F. A. Shah, learned counsel for petitioners. Shri Kuldeep Singh, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1-State. Shri Anil Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 2- complainant.
2. Heard on admission. The present petition under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code is being preferred by the petitioners for quashment of FIR registered at Police Station Jhansi Road, Gwalior vide Crime No. 321/2018 for the offence under sections 420, 406, 506, 120-B of Indian Penal Code and the investigation proceeded on the basis of registration of FIR.
3. Precisely stated facts of the case (and prosecution story) are that a written application was submitted by respondent No. 2/ complainant on 4-8-2018 at Police Station Jhansi Road, Gwalior with the allegations that he lent some amount by way of hundi transaction to petitioner No. 1 under the knowledge of petitioner No. 2, part of which was repaid by the petitioners and as of now Rs. 41,50,000/- is to be paid by the petitioner No. 1.
4. Since petitioner No. 1 started dilly dallying the matter and was not prompt in repayment therefore, social involvement was sought by respondent No. 2 resulted into
State of Telangana vs. Habib Abdullah Jeelani and others
Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat and another
Shri Mahavir Prashad Gupta and anr. vs. State of National Capital and others
Vijayander Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan
G. Sagar Suri and another vs. State of U.P. and others
Kola Veera Raghav Rao vs. Gorantla Venkateswara Rao and anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.