SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 1238

N.K.MODY
Chater Bai W/O Kannu Adiwasi – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajeev Sharma
For the Respondent: Mukund Bharadwaj

ORDER :

Shri Rajeev Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Mukund Bharadwaj, learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

With the consent of parties, heard finally.

Being aggrieved by the order dated 24-4-2009 passed by Additional Sessions Jude, Ganjbasoda in ST. No. 01/09 whereby charge was framed under section 306 Indian Penal Code against the petitioners, present petition has been filed.

2. In short, the case of the prosecution was that deceased Pushpabai committed suicide on 6-2-2008 due to burn injury. In prosecution it was found that upon instigation of petitioner the deceased Pushpabai committed suicide. After filing challan, charge-sheet was framed against the petitioners under section 306 Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order passed by the learned Court below is illegal incorrect and deserves to be set aside. It is submitted that the petitioners are ladies and from the dying declaration of the deceased, it is evident that the deceased was found in company of one Daulat. Thereafter, when deceased came to the house of the petitioners, then the petitioners told the deceased that she was involved with Daulat, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top