SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 342

SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
Radha Krishna Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Sharma for appellant; M. P. S. Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General for respondent/State.

ORDER

Nagu, J.-- 1. This intra Court Appeal u/S. 2 (1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, assails the final order dated 1.7.2020 in W.P.8940/2020 passed by learned Single Judge while exercising writ jurisdiction u/Art.226 of the Constitution dismissing the petition in question by which challenge was made to the order dated 19.3.2020 issued u/rule 9(1) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (“Pension Rules” for brevity) vide P-1 withdrawing 100% pension of petitioner who had retired from the post of Revenue Inspector on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.5.2016.

1.1 The challenge to the order of withdrawing of pension was primarily based on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice (audi alterm partem).

2. Learned Single Judge held that in absence of any prejudice established by petitioner, the non-issuance of show-cause notice prior to withdrawal of pension cannot per se assist the petitioner in the absence of establishing prejudice, for which reliance was placed on Natwar Singh v. Director of Enforcement [

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top