SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 450

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Shiv Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Bansal – Respondent


Advocates:
Meena Singhal for appellants; M.L. Bansal for respondent No.1; B.K. Agarwal for respondent No.3 Insurance Company.

JUDGMENT

1. Assailing the award dated 29.11.2011 passed by Third Additional Judge to the Court of First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Gwalior, in Claim Case No. 33/2011, on the point of inadequacy of the compensation, this appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants under section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2. It is pertinent to mention here that in the present case the appellants-claimants had filed IA No. 4794/2018 for extending the amount of compensation, which was allowed by this Court vide order dated 22.7.2019. Thus, the appellants have extended the amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.5.00 lacs, in addition to the compensation already awarded by the Claims Tribunal. 3. Since the Tribunal has found that the accident has occurred and in the accident Bobby @ Ekant Jatav has died, therefore, it is not necessary to narrate the entire facts in detail as to the manner the accident has occurred, to burden the judgment on the said issues. This appeal is being decided only on the point of inadequacy of the compensation.

4. In this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top